This website uses cookies. By browsing this website, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. To learn more about how we use cookies, please read our Privacy Statement.
POSLUMA vs 18F-DCFPyL in patients with BCR and very low PSA levels (≤0.5 ng/mL)
POSLUMA outperformed 18F-DCFPyL
A prospective, multicenter, intrapatient, head-to-head comparator study of patients with suspected biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer who received scans with 18F-DCFPyL and POSLUMA1
POSLUMA vs 18F-DCFPyL: Evaluating urinary bladder activity and detection rates
Initial enrollment
67 patients enrolled with BCR and PSA levels ≤0.5 ng/mL1
PSMA PET administration
18F-DCFPyL1
At least 24 hours, but no more than 10 days between scans1
Second PSMA PET administration
POSLUMA PET1
Evaluation
55 evaluable patients with both PSMA PET scans1
At least 24 hours, but no more than 10 days between scans1
ENDPOINTS
Primary endpoint1
Difference in urinary bladder SUVmeanas determined using quantification software
The difference in urinary bladder SUVmean will be calculated for each patient as: 18F-DCFPyLSUVmean – POSLUMA SUVmean
Secondary endpoints1
Detection rate analyses including patient level and subgroups, PSA level, prostate bed and related subregions, and pelvic lymph nodes
Determined by 2 blinded readers, with a third independent reader resolving disagreements
Scans were not matched by patient for comparison
URINARY BLADDER ACTIVITY
Median urinary bladder activity for 18F-DCFPyL was statistically significantly higher than POSLUMA1
Difference in urinary bladder SUVmean
Bladder SUVmean
A positive difference represents greater bladder activity for 18F-DCFPyL1
Median SUVmean for 18F-DCFPyL was 29.0 (IQR, 18.9 to 40.8) and 10.9 (IQR, 6.0 to 18.5) for POSLUMA as measured by quantification software. Difference in SUVmean was 15.1 (IQR, 8.5 to 27.0; P<.001).1
bladder SUVmean for 18F-DCFPyL than for POSLUMA as measured by quantification software1
The difference is obvious: POSLUMA precision imaging facilitates quick, detailed interpretation
DETECTION AT VERY LOW PSA LEVELS
POSLUMA had higher detection rates at very low PSA levels compared to 18F-DCFPyL1
References: 1. Nordquist LT, Andrews JR, Kuo PH, et al. An intra-patient contemporaneous comparison of 18F-piflufolastat and 18F-flotufolastat urinary radioactivity and pelvic region detection rates in men with low PSA biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2026. doi:10.1007/s00259-025-07732-y